Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38081538

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patient characteristics, risks, and outcomes associated with reoperative multivalve cardiac surgery are poorly characterized. Effect of patient variables and surgical components of each reoperation were evaluated with regard to operative mortality. METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2022, 2324 patients with previous cardiac surgery underwent 2352 reoperations involving repair or replacement of multiple cardiac valves at Cleveland Clinic. Mean age was 66 ± 14 years. Number of surgical components representing surgical complexity (valve procedures, aortic surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, and atrial fibrillation procedures) ranged from 2 to 6. Random forest for imbalanced data was used to identify risk factors for operative mortality. RESULTS: Surgery was elective in 1327 (56%), urgent in 1006 (43%), and emergency in 19 (0.8%). First-time reoperations were performed in 1796 (76%) and 556 (24%) had 2 or more previous operations. Isolated multivalve operations comprised 54% (1265) of cases; 1087 incorporated additional surgical components. Two valves were operated on in 80% (1889) of cases, 3 in 20% (461), and 4 in 0.09% (2). Operative mortality was 4.2% (98 out of 2352), with 1.7% (12 out of 704) for elective, isolated multivalve reoperations. For each added surgical component, operative mortality incrementally increased, from 2.4% for 2 components (24 out of 1009) to 17% for ≥5 (5 out of 30). Predictors of operative mortality included coronary artery bypass grafting, surgical urgency, cardiac, renal dysfunction, peripheral artery disease, New York Heart Association functional class, and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Elective, isolated reoperative multivalve surgery can be performed with low mortality. Surgical complexity coupled with key physiologic factors can be used to inform surgical risk and decision making.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37074251

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate outcomes after aortic root allograft reoperation, identify risk factors for morbidity and mortality, and describe practice evolution since publication of our 2006 allograft reoperation study. METHODS: From January 1987 to July 2020, 602 patients underwent 632 allograft-related reoperations at Cleveland Clinic: 144 before 2006 (early era, which suggested radical explant was superior to aortic-valve-replacement-within-allograft [AVR-only]), and 488 from 2006 to present (recent era). Indications for reoperation were structural valve deterioration in 502 (79%), infective endocarditis in 90 (14%), and nonstructural valve deterioration/noninfective endocarditis in 40 (6.3%). Reoperative techniques included radical allograft explant in 372 (59%), AVR-only in 248 (39%), and allograft preservation in 12 (1.9%). Perioperative events and survival were assessed among indications, techniques, and eras. RESULTS: Operative mortality by indication was 2.2% (n = 11) for structural valve deterioration, 7.8% (n = 7) in those with infective endocarditis, and 7.5% (n = 3) for nonstructural valve deterioration/noninfective endocarditis, and by surgical approach 2.4% (n = 9) after radical explant, 4.0% (n = 10) for AVR-only, and 17% (n = 2) for allograft preservation. Operative adverse events occurred in 4.9% (n = 18) of radical explants and 2.8% (n = 7) of AVR-only procedures (P = .2). Patients undergoing radical explants received larger valves than those undergoing AVR-only (median, 25 vs 23 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root allograft reoperations present a technical challenge but can be performed with low mortality and morbidity. Radical explant offers outcomes similar to AVR-only while allowing for implant of larger prostheses. Increasing experience with allograft reoperations has permitted excellent outcomes; thus, risk of reoperation should not dissuade surgeons from using allografts for invasive aortic valve infective endocarditis and other indications.

4.
Front Surg ; 8: 644656, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33748183

RESUMO

Purpose: Benign endobronchial tumors are rare entities that can be difficult to diagnose because they often present with non-specific symptoms and vague radiographic findings. The current study reviews the clinical, radiologic and pathologic features, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with benign endobronchial tumors. Methods: We examined the charts of all patients who presented with biopsy-proven benign endobronchial tumors at a tertiary-care academic medical center between 1993 and 2018. Pertinent clinicopathologic and radiologic data were analyzed, with particular attention paid to treatment modalities and mean overall patient survival. Results: A total of 28 cases were identified. The most common benign neoplasm was hamartoma (37%), followed by lipoma (19%), squamous papilloma (11%), pleomorphic adenoma (7%), mucin gland adenoma (7%), papillary adenoma (3%), hemangioma (3%), neurofibroma (3%), leiomyoma (3%), and papillomatosis (3%). Cough (58%), shortness of breath (44%), and hemoptysis (15%) were the most frequent presentations. Most cases demonstrated well-defined submucosal or pedunculated endobronchial lesions with segmental pneumonia or atelectasis on imaging. Histologic diagnosis was obtained by endobronchial resection in 43% of patients, thoracoscopic lobectomy in 36%, endobronchial biopsy in 18%, and thoracoscopic wedge resections in 3%. All procedures were performed with no intraoperative or in-hospital deaths (mean overall survival: 20.2 years). Conclusion: Benign endobronchial tumors typically present as well-defined submucosal and/or pedunculated lesions, and may lead to post-obstructive complications. Endobronchial resection is the preferred strategy for diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.

5.
Psychol Sci ; 32(3): 326-339, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33539228

RESUMO

In this direct replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer's (2014) Study 1, participants watched a lecture while taking notes with a laptop (n = 74) or longhand (n = 68). After a brief distraction and without the opportunity to study, they took a quiz. As in the original study, laptop participants took notes containing more words spoken verbatim by the lecturer and more words overall than did longhand participants. However, laptop participants did not perform better than longhand participants on the quiz. Exploratory meta-analyses of eight similar studies echoed this pattern. In addition, in both the original study and our replication, higher word count was associated with better quiz performance, and higher verbatim overlap was associated with worse quiz performance, but the latter finding was not robust in our replication. Overall, results do not support the idea that longhand note taking improves immediate learning via better encoding of information.


Assuntos
Aprendizagem , Microcomputadores , Humanos
6.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 110(2): e107-e109, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31987824

RESUMO

Cystic thymoma is a rare clinicopathologic entity. Chronic inflammation within and around these tumors has been suggested to compromise the vascular supply, leading to hemorrhage into the lesion and necrosis. This can result in rapid expansion of the tumor and symptoms owing to local compression. We present the case of a patient with a biopsy-proven lymphocytic-predominant thymoma who underwent resection to reveal a hemorrhagic, necrotic mediastinal cyst adjacent to a focus of organizing pneumonia, with no residual thymoma.


Assuntos
Cisto Mediastínico/cirurgia , Timoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Timo/cirurgia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Cisto Mediastínico/complicações , Timoma/complicações , Neoplasias do Timo/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...